Gold Nanoparticle Treated Textile-Based Materials for Potential use as Wearable Sensors

Gold Nanoparticle Treated Textile-Based Materials for Potential use as Wearable Sensors

Loading document ...
Page
of
Loading page ...

Author(s)

Author(s): Gerrard Eddy Jai Poinern, Kam Ling Chan, Derek Fawcett

Download Full PDF Read Complete Article

DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1018 453 895 82-89 Volume 5 - May 2016

Abstract

Wearable sensors for monitoring and clinical applications for non-hospital-based healthcare has the potential to significantly reduce healthcare costs and permit individuals to maintain an independent lifestyle free of the constraints imposed by hospital-based care. Wearable, small chemical sensors have the potential to deliver a wide range of reliable on body monitoring systems for personal monitoring and detecting chemicals in the environment. The present work investigates the potential of using widely available commercial fabric materials as chemical sensors. Various fabrics including natural, synthetics and blends of both natural and synthetic were treated with gold nanoparticle solutions to determine the treatments effectiveness in changing a materials electrical resistance. The studies found treating the fabrics reduced the materials resistive characteristics. The study also found that treated natural silk fabrics could also be used to detect ethanol vapour. Thus, making treated silk fabrics a potential chemical sensor.

Keywords

textiles, gold nanoparticles, electrical resistance, wearable, chemical sensors

References

  1. Wilson, S.A., Jourdain, R.P.J., Zhang, Q., et al. 2007. New materials for micro-scale sensors and actuators: An engineering review. Materials Science and Engineering R. 56: 1-129.
  2. Wales, D.J., Grand, J., Ting, V.P., et al. 2015. Gas sensing using porous materials for automotive applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44: 4290-4321.
  3. Bhandari, B., Lee, G.Y., Ahn, S.H. 2012. A review on IPMC material as actuators and sensors: Fabrication, characteristics and applications. International Journal of Precision Engineering Manufacturing. 13(1): 141-163.
  4. Ragazzo-Sanchez, J.A., Chalier, P., Chevalier-Lucia, D., et al. 2009. Off-Flavours detection in alcoholic beverages by electronic nose coupled to GC. Sens. Actuators B. 140: 29-34.
  5. Barbri, N.E., Mirhisse, J., Ionescu, R., et al. 2009. An electronic nose system based on a micro-machined gas sensor array to assess the freshness of sardines. Sens. Actuators B. 141: 538-543.
  6. Zappa, D., Comini, E., Zamani, R., et al. 2013. Preparation of copper oxide nanowire-based conductometric chemical sensors. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 182: 7-15.
  7. Hoa, N. D., Quy, N.V., Jung, H., et al. 2010. Synthesis of porous CuO nanowires and its application to hydrogen detection. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 146(1): 266-272.
  8. Branca, A., Simonian, P., Ferrante, M., et al. 2003. Electronic nose based discrimination of a perfumery compound in a fragrance. Sens. Actuators B. 92: 222-227.
  9. Windmiller, J.R. and Wang, J. 2013. Wearable electrochemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Electroanalysis. 25: 29–46.
  10. Turner, A. 2013. Biosensors: then and now. Trends Biotechnol. 31: 119–120.
  11. Bandodkar A.J., Joseph Wang, J. 2014. Non-invasive wearable electrochemical sensors: a review. Trends in Biotechnology. 32(7): 363-371.
  12. Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., et al. 2012. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 9(21): 1-17.
  13. Bonato, P. 2010. Wearable sensors and systems. From enabling technology to clinical applications. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 29: 25-36.
  14. Guinovart, T., Parrilla, M., Crespo, G.A., et al. 2013. Potentiometric sensors using cotton yarns, carbon nanotubes and polymeric membranes. Analyst. 138(18): 5208–5215.
  15. Chinta, S.K., Gujar, P.D. 2013. Significance of moisture management for high performance textile fabrics. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology. 2(3): 814-819.
  16. Schazmann, B., Morris, D., Slater, C., et al. 2010. A wearable electrochemical sensor for the real-time measurement of sweat sodium concentration. Anal. Methods 2, 342–348.
  17. Jia, W., Bandodkar, A.J., Valdes-Ramirez, G., et al. 2013. Electrochemical tattoo biosensors for real-time noninvasive lactate monitoring in human perspiration. Anal. Chem. 85, 6553–6560.
  18. Patel, S., Hughes, R., Hester, T., et al. 2010. A novel approach to monitor rehabilitation outcomes in stroke survivors using wearable technology. Proceedings of the IEEE. 98: 450-461.
  19. Adomaitiene, A., Kumpikaite, E. 2011. Analysis of mechanical properties of fabrics of different raw materials. Materials Science (Medziagotyra). 17(2): 168-173.
  20. Hersh, S.P., Montgomery, D.J. 1952. Electrical resistance measurements on fibres and fibre assemblies. Textile Research Journal. 22(12): 805-818.

Cite this Article:

  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • APA
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Vancouver
  • Chicago

International Journal of Sciences is Open Access Journal.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
Author(s) retain the copyrights of this article, though, publication rights are with Alkhaer Publications.

Search Articles

Issue July 2019

Volume 8, July 2019


Table of Contents


Order Print Copy

World-wide Delivery is FREE

Share this Issue with Friends:


Submit your Paper