Land Tenure Systems in Kisumu City; The Formal-Informal Dichotomy

Land Tenure Systems in Kisumu City; The Formal-Informal Dichotomy

Loading document ...
Page
of
Loading page ...

Author(s)

Author(s): George G. Wagah, Mathenge Mwehe, Nelson Obange, Peris Teyie, Maria Nystrom

Download Full PDF Read Complete Article

DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1450 163 502 32-42 Volume 6 - Oct 2017

Abstract

In the process of urbanization, the peri-urban areas are often the front line of urban transformation and transition and therefore potential zones of conflicts over land tenure arrangements. This study sought to explore land tenure arrangements, administration and governance in the peri-urban zones of Kisumu city. The objective was to provide empirical evidence on the conflicts and emerging governance issues in Kisumu city. In this working paper, we recognize three main drivers as being particularly important for facilitating equitable land use and therefore good outcomes from urbanization in Kisumu; Sound land use planning, smoothly functioning land and housing markets and capable and responsive land market. The results, based on the insights gained through conversational interviews as well as desk-top reviews show that public land tenure, leaseholds, freeholds and community land tenure systems are the most widespread in the study area. Holding land under leasehold and freehold tenure appears to be more widespread within peri-urban fringe. Whereas elaborate town planning criteria should ideally direct resource allocation, the challenge for Kisumu like other developing towns and cities is that it has been developing against a backdrop of poor urban planning practice.

Keywords

Land tenure, Tenure security, Land use, Informality

References

  1. Abbott, J. (2002a). An analysis of informal settlement upgrading and critique of existing methodological approaches. [doi: DOI: 10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00049-2]. Habitat International, 26(3), 303-315.
  2. Abbott, J. (2002b). A method-based planning framework for informal settlement upgrading. [doi: DOI: 10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00050-9]. Habitat International, 26(3), 317-333.
  3. Agnihotri, P. (1994). Poverty amidst prosperity: Survey of slums: MD Publications Pvt. Ltd.
  4. Augustinus, C. (2003). Handbook on best practices, security of tenure, and access to land: implementation of the Habitat Agenda, Un-habitat.
  5. Ambaye, D. W. (2011). Informal Settlement in Ethiopia: the Case of two Kebeles in Bahir Dar City. Morocco: Informal Settlement Issues, Spatial Development, Planning and Governance.
  6. Awange, J., & Onganga, O. (2006). Lake Victoria, Ecology, resources, environment. New York: Springer.
  7. Ballaney, S. (2008). The Town Planning Mechanism in Gujarat, India. Washington, D.C.: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development /The World Bank.
  8. Ballaney, S. & Patel, B. (2009). Using the ‘Development Plan—Town Planning Scheme’ Mechanism to Appropriate Land and Build Urban Infrastructure.
  9. Bajec L (2009). Rational or Collaborative Model of Urban Planning in Serbia: Institutional Limitations. UDK BROJEVI: 711.4(497.11).
  10. Biles, J. J. (2008). Informal Works in Latin America: Competing Perspectives and Decent Debates. Geography Campass, 3(1), 214-236.
  11. Conklin, J (2005): Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems, Wiley.
  12. Dale, P. and J. McLaughlin (1999). Land administration, Oxford University Press, USA.
  13. Durand-Lasserve, A. and L. Royston (2002). Holding their ground: Secure land tenure for the urban poor in developing countries, Earthscan/James & James.
  14. FAO (2002). "Land tenure and rural development."
  15. Feiock (2007). Rational choice and regional governance. Journal of urban affairs, Volume 29, Number 1, pages 47–63. Florida State University
  16. Fekade, W. (2000). Deficits of formal urban land management and informal responses under rapid urban growth, an international perspective. Habitat International, 24(2), 127-150.
  17. Feder, G. and A. Nishio (1998). "The benefits of land registration and titling: economic and social perspectives." Land Use Policy 15(1): 25-43.
  18. Fitzpatrick, D. (2005). "Evolution and Chaos in Property Right Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access." Yale LJ 115: 996.
  19. Hill, A., & Lindner, C. (Eds.). (2006). Modelling and Simulating Urban Processes. New brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
  20. Huchzermeyer, M., Karam, A., Stemela, I. L., Siliga, N. & Frazenburg, S. (2006). Policy, Data, and Civil Society: Reflections on South African Challenges through an International Review. South Africa: UCT Press.
  21. International Federation of Surveyors, F., UN-Habitat, & Global Land Tool Network, G. (2010). The Social Tenure Domain Model:A Pro-Poor Land Tool.
  22. Kahuri, K., (2010). Engendered Land Administration System – Mysore Slums Upgrading, ITC, University of Twente. Enshede.
  23. KCC. (2009). Kisumu City Development Stratergy: A stratergic framework.
  24. Marcus, A., & Asmorowati, S. (2006). Urban Poverty and the Rural Development Bias: Some Notes from Indonesia. Journal of Developing Societies, 22(2), 145-168.
  25. Magalhaes, F. & Eduardo, R. (2007). Facing the Challenges of Informal Settlements in Urban Centres: The Re-urbanization of Manaus, Brazil. Washington, D.C.: Sustainable Development Department.
  26. Meinzen-Dick, R. and E. Mwangi (2009). "Cutting the web of interests: Pitfalls of formalizing property rights." Land Use Policy 26(1): 36-43.
  27. Muraguri, L. (2012). Kenyan Government Initiatives in Slum Upgrading. HAL, 44, pp.119-128.
  28. Mwenda, A., 2010. Devolution in Kenya: Prospects, Challenges and Future. Nairobi: Institute of Economic Affairs. IEA Research Paper Series No. 24, Pp. 8-13
  29. Midheme, E.,(2007). State-vs community- led land tenure regularization in Tanzania. The case of Dar es Salaam city. ITC, Enschede
  30. Muchai, R., (2009). Community participation in determining standards in Spatial planning, the case of peri urban Kisumu, ITC, Esnchede
  31. Tsenkova, S. (2012). Urban Planning and Informal Cities in Southeast Europe. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 29(4), 292
  32. Okonyo, E. (2008). Customary tenure: ‘opportunity’ or ‘obstacle’ to urban land development? , ITC, Enschede.
  33. Owusu, G and Agyei, J., (2007). Changes in land access, rights and livelihoods in peri urban Ghana. The case of Kumasi and Tamale metropolis, Princeton
  34. Powell, J. A. & Spencer, M. L. (2002). Giving Them the Old One-Two: Gentrification and the K. O. Of Impoverished Urban Dwellers of Color. Berkeley: Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository.
  35. Physical-Planning-Department. (2009). Kisumu Concept Plan.
  36. Payne(2002a). Introduction. In G. Payne (ed), Land, rights and innovation: Improving tenure security for the urban poor, London: ITDG Publishing.
  37. Roy, A. (2005). Urban Infromality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of American Planning Association, 71(2), 147-158.
  38. Sliuzas, R. (2003). Opportunities for enhancing communication in settlement upgrading with geographic information technology-based support tools. Habitat International, 27(4), 613-628.
  39. Silva, C., (2013). Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance. IGI Global. Release Date: June 30, 2013 ISBN: 9781466641693
  40. Scholz, W. (2008). Challenges of Informal Urbanization, the Case of Zanzibar, Tanzania: Spring research series 50, University of Dortmund.
  41. Sulaiman, M. S., & Ali, M. H. (2006). The Causes and Consequences of the Informal Settlements in Zanzibar. Paper presented at the Shaping the Change, XXIII FIG Congress, Munich, Germany.
  42. Turkstra, J., & Raithelhuber, M. (2004). Urban slum monitoring. Retrieved from http://proceedings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc04/abstracts/a1667.html
  43. UN-Habitat, (2003). Handbook on best practices: security of tenure and access to land. Nairobi:UN-Habitat
  44. UN-Habitat, (2008). The State of African Cities 2008. A framework for addressing urban challenges in Africa. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT), Nairobi, KENYA.
  45. UNHabitat (Ed.). (2005). Situation Analysis of Informal Seetlements in Kisumu. Nairobi: UN habitat, Cities without Slum Sub-regional Programm for Eastern and Southern Africa.
  46. UN-Habitat. (2006). Upgrading of urban Slums and Squatter Areas. Retrieved from http://www.unhabitat.org/
  47. UN-Habitat. (2009). Global report on Human Settlement.
  48. UN-Habitat, (2014b). The State of African Cities 2014. Re-imagining sustainable urban transitions. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT). Nairobi, KENYA.
  49. UN-Millennium-Project. (2005). Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals. New York.
  50. UNDP. (2005). A Home in the City: Report of the Millenium Project Task Force on Improving the Lives of Slum Dwellers. London.
  51. Vandergrift, J. (2006). Gentrification and Displacement. Urban Altruism: Calvin College. www.calvin.edu/~jks4/city.
  52. Wallace, J. and I. Williamson (2006). "Building land markets." Land Use Policy 23(2): 123-135.
  53. Werlin, H. (1999). The Slum Upgrading Myth. Urban Studies, 36(9), 1523-1534.
  54. WorldBank. (2010). Upgrading urban communities. A resources for Practitioners. Retrieved 5/08/2010, 2010, from http://web.mit.edu/urbanupgrading/
  55. Yabes, R. (Ed.). (2000). Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning: Henry Sanoff, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2000, 306 pp (Vol. 50).
  56. Zevenbergen, J. (1999). Are cadastres really serving the landowner.

Cite this Article:

  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • APA
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Vancouver
  • Chicago

International Journal of Sciences is Open Access Journal.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
Author(s) retain the copyrights of this article, though, publication rights are with Alkhaer Publications.

Search Articles

Issue December 2019

Volume 8, December 2019


Table of Contents


Order Print Copy

World-wide Delivery is FREE

Share this Issue with Friends:


Submit your Paper