Supporting Students as a Means of Preventing Dropout in Open and Distance Education

Author(s): Panagiota Xanthopoulou, Emmanouil Stavrakakis

The purpose of the current research is to explore how to reduce the dropout rates in Distance Education through supporting students. More precisely, it focuses on measures that can be taken to help and encourage students facing difficulties and dealing with obstacles during their studies at the Hellenic Open University, thus fighting against dropout. The analysis of the results showed that both the academic staff and the students of the postgraduate program “Education Sciences” believe that the assistance provided to the students is not sufficient and that further measures should be taken to support students more effectively. Tutors, as well as students, claim that not only the role of a tutor is what ensures confidence during guidance and creating a climate of encouragement and support, but also he/she is the key person who can help, both academically and psychologically, students to continue their studies and finish them successfully. Tutors who participated in this research pointed out that, by supporting students, they can become more independent, while students claimed that they need more guidance, encouragement, and assistance from their tutors, even when they do not face difficulties while studying. Students feel that “Tutor –Student” communication is not as essential or effective as it should be and they further believe that a common line should be adopted so that all educators treat all students equally in all seriousness, especially those who encounter difficulties that affect their studies. Students also highlighted the importance of communication, cooperation, and collaboration between students and suggest that both the educational institution and its academic staff should employ these methods. Finally, the Hellenic Open University should adopt new methods and keep up with the current trends in the field of distance education, in order to integrate all students, even those who are at risk of dropping out.

Open and Distance Education Dropout, Student Support, Hellenic Open University, Study Obstacles

1. Bajtelsmit, J. W. (1988). Predicting Distance Learning Drop-outs: Testing a conceptual model of attrition in distance study. Bryn Mawr: The American College.
2. Bates A.W. (2005), Technology, E-learning and distance education. London: Routledge Falmer
3. Bell, J. (1997). Methodological planning of pedagogical and social research (a guide for students and doctoral candidates), ref. AB Riga, Athens: Gutenberg
4. Cambruzzi W, Rigo SJ, Barbosa JL. (2015). Dropout Prediction and Reduction in Distance Education Courses with the Learning Analytics Multitrail Approach. Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 21, no. 1
5. Choi, H., Lee, Y., Jung, I. & Latchem, C. (2013). The Extent of and Reasons for Non Re-Enrolment: A Case of Korea National Open University. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 14 (No4), 19-36.
6. Creswell, J., (2011), Research in Education, Designing, Conducting and Evaluating Qualitative and Qualitative Research, Athens: Ion.
7. Evans, T., and Lockwood, F. (1994). Understanding Learners in Open and Distance Education. London: Kogan Page.
8. Evans, T., and Nation, D. (1996). Opening Education: Policies and Practices from Open and Distance Learning. London: Routledge.
9. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003), E–Learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Falmer. Giles, I. M. (1999). An Examination of Persistence and Dropout in the Online Computer-Conferenced Classroom. Doctoral Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Northern Virginia Center.
10. Grapsa, Α. & Μavroeidis, Η. (2017). Student support and integration mechanisms in the UAE: The case of the systemic program Online Human Touch. 9th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning - November 2017, Athens, Greece – PROCEEDINGS.
11. Keegan, D. (1993). Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, London, Routledge.
12. Kokkos, A. (2005), Adult Education: Detecting the Field, Athens: Metaichimo.
13. Konstantopoulou, F., Antoniou, P., Apostolakis, E., Lionarakis, A., (2013). The support, through communication, of the students at Open and Distance Education by the Teaching Advisor. 7th International Conference on Open and Distance Education, Hellenic Open University, Hellenic Open and Distance Education Network, Athens.
14. Lionarakis, A. (1998), The First Teacher-Student Contact & Continuous Communication and Student Assessment, In: Open Distance Education, Teacher-Student Relations, Volume B, Patras: HOU.
15. Lionarakis, A. (2010), Open Universities and Distance Universities in Europe. Two different educational considerations in search of identity. Available at: http://edu4adults.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post_2385.html#ixzz1jTpkaxzC
16. Lionarakis, A. & Lykourgiotis, A. (1998), Open and Traditional Education. In D. Vergidis, A. Lionarakis, A. Lykourgiotis, V. Makrakis & C. Matralis (Ed.), Open and Distance Education: Institutions and Functions. Patras: HOU
17. Lionarakis, Apostolidou, Manousou, Ligoutsikou, Ioakimidou,. . ., & Briefcase (2017). The Need to Develop Support Systems in Open and Distance Education: Key Issues and Good Practices. International Conference on Open & Distance Education, 9, 148-163.
18. Matralis, C. (1998). Requirements from teachers. In: D. Vergidis, A. Lionarakis, A. Lykourgiotis, V. Makrakis & C. Matralis, Open and Distance Education. Institutions and functions. Patras: HOU
19. Moore, M. "Theory of transactional distance." Keegan, D., ed. "Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (1997), Routledge, pp. 22-38
20. Moore, M. G. (1989), Editorial: Three types of interaction, American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2)
21. Moore, M .G. & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A system view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. National Center for Education Statistics (NCED).
22. Nikolaki, E., Koutsouba, M. & Lykesas (2013). Written Assignments and Group Counseling as important pedagogical tools in supporting self-regulated learning strategies in the HOU environment. 7th International Conference on Open and Distance Education, Hellenic Open University, Hellenic Open and Distance Education Network, Athens
23. Sheets, M. F. (1992). Characteristics of adult education students and factors which determine course completion: A review. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 6 (1), (pp.3-18).
24. Sims, R., & Stork, E. (2007), Design for contextual learning: Web-based environments that engage diverse learners, In J. Richardson & A. Ellis (Eds.), Proceedings of AusWeb07. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.
25. Spanaka, A. (2011). Supportive Services in Distance Education: The Example of Three Open Universities. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), 6th International Conference on Open and Distance Education. "Alternative Forms of Education", 4-6 November 2011 (pp. 166-173). Loutraki.
26. Street, H. (2010). Factors Influencing a Learner's Decision to Drop-Out or Persist in Higher Education Distance Learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, v13 n4.
27. Tinto, V. (1975). Drop-out from higher education: A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research. Review of Educational Research 45(1) 89 – 125.
28. Vassala P. & Andreadou, D. (2009). Support from peer tutors and peers in distance education: The views of the graduates of the Hellenic Open University Postgraduate Program, 5th International Conference on Open and Distance Education, Athens 27-29 November 2009.
29. Vergidis, D., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2002). Student Dropout at the Hellenic Open University: Evaluation of the Graduate Program," Studies in Education". The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(2).
30. Zeitoun, H. (2008), E-learning: Concept, Issues, Application, Evaluation, Riyadh: Dar Alsolateah publication
31. Zygouris, F. & Mavroidis H., (2011), Teaching and Teaching Communication in Distance Education, Case Study in the KEEN.AP Teacher Training Program, Open Education-The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 7 (1), pp. 69-86