The Role of Forest Resources in the Performance of Community Forest Enterprise in Mexico: Analytical Framework from Competitive Strategy

The Role of Forest Resources in the Performance of Community Forest Enterprise in Mexico: Analytical Framework from Competitive Strategy

Author(s)

J. Regino Maldonado, Yali Wen, Carpenter Christopher

Download Full PDF DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.700 Downloads: 307 Views: 591 Pages: 14-24

Volume 4 - May 2015 (05)

Abstract

The objective was to make an analytical framework to support the strategy and performance of the community forest enterprise. To do this, we used theoretical analysis of the contributions of the main theories of the firm. The new institutional economics the role of institutions in common were analyzed. The institutions of governance and property rights of the communities determine the organizational structure and incentives. The possibilities of exchange of production and efficiency of community forest enterprise. The enterprise aligns multiple objectives in the governance of the commons, and the strategy. Community forest enterprise´s strategy is based on the use and control of forest resources and engages simultaneously in vertical integration in so far as they mature management skills and production in general. The analysis of the literature suggests that the performance of the community forest enterprise is positive because they are not only profitable domestic market, but also contribute to poverty reduction and environmental protection. However, it has implications as pressure on forest resources, over-regulation of natural resources; individuals do not achieve the social optimum, and therefore high-risk domestic market and loss of competitiveness internationally.

Keywords

Common-pool Resources; Vertical Integration; New Institutional Economics; Theory Of The Firm; Resource-based View; Structural Theory

References

  1. Agrawal, A., Gibson, C. C., 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00161-2
  2. Ahn, T. K., Ostrom, E., 2002. Social capital and the second generation theories of collective action: An analytical approach to the forms of social capital, Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  3. Alchian, A. A., 1995. Vertical integration and regulation in the telephone industry. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol. 16. 323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090160406
  4. Antinori, C. M., 2000. Vertical integration in Mexican common property forests. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
  5. Antinori, C. M., Bray, D. B., 2005. Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: economic and institutional perspectives from México. World Development, 33 (9),1529-1543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.011
  6. Antinori, C., 2007. Integración vertical en las empresas forestales comunitarias de Oaxaca. In Bray, D., Merino, L., Barry, D. (eds.). Los bosques comunitarios de México: manejo sustentable de paisajes forestales. 303-342.
  7. Azqueta, D., Ferreiro, A., 1994. Análisis económico y gestión de los recursos naturales. Alianza Económica. Madrid.
  8. Bain, J., 1954. Economics of scale, concentration, and the conditions of entry in twenty manufacturing industries. American Economic Review, 44, 15-34.
  9. Barney, J., 1986, Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science, 32 (10), 656-665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231
  10. Barney, J., 1991, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  11. Boyce, J. K., Shelly, B. G., 2003. Natural assets: Democratizing environmental ownership. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  12. Burger, J., Ostrom, E., Norgaard, R., Policansky, D., Goldstein, B., 2001. Reformulating the commons. En protecting the commons: a framework for resource management in the Americas, Washington, D. C., Island Press, 17-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0376892902300079
  13. Bray, D. B., Merino Pérez, L., Negreros-Castillo, P., Segura-Warnholtz, G., Torres-Rojo, J.M., Vester, H. F. M., 2003. Mexico’s community-managed forests as a global model for sustainable landscapes. Conservation Biology 17 (3), 672– 677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01639.x
  14. Bray, D.B., Merino-Pérez, L., 2004. La experiencia de las comunidades forestales en México: Veinticinco años de silvicultura y construcción de empresas comunitarias. Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INI-SEMARNAT), México City.
  15. Bray, D., Antinori, C., Torres-Rojo, J., 2006. The Mexican model of community forest management. Forest Policy and Economics. 8, 470-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.08.002
  16. Brush, C., Chaganti, R., 1998. Businesses without glamour? An analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 14, 233-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00103-1
  17. Carlton, D., Perloff, J., 2005. Modern industrial organization. Addison-Wesley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/83.1.254
  18. Changhai, W., Wen, Y., Jing, W., 2014. The socio-economic effect of the reform of the collective forest rights system in Suthern China: A case of Tonggu County, Jiangxi Province.Small-scale Forestry, Published online: doi:10.1007/s11842-014-9263-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9263-9
  19. Coase, R. H., 1937. The nature of the firm, Economica, 4, 386-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
  20. Coase, R. H., 1960. The problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466560
  21. Coloma, G. (2002). Industrial organization notes (part 1). Working paper, 221, 1- 96.
  22. Coloma, G. (2002). ). Industrial organization notes (part 2). Working paper 222, 1-89.
  23. Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2012. Tenencia forestal y silvicultura comunitaria en México. Available in.
  24. Comisión Nacional Forestal (CONAFOR), 2013. Logros y perspectivas del desarrollo forestal en México 2007-2012. Coordinación general de producción y productividad. 1-56.
  25. Cortave, M., 2003. La experiencia de ACOFOP en Petén, Guatemala: un proceso arduo de gestión política. Centro de Derecho Ambiental y de los Recursos Naturales/Coordinadora Indígena-Campesina de Agroforesteria Comunitaria. San José Costa Rica.
  26. Clark, C. W., 1990. Mathematical bioeconomics: The optimal control of renewable Resources, Wiley Intersicence.
  27. Cubbage, F., Davis, R., Rodriguez, D., Frey, G., Mollenhauer, R., Kraus, Y., González, I., Albarrán, H., Salazar, A., Chemor, D., 2013. Competitividad y acceso a mercados de empresas forestales comunitarias en México. PROFOR. 1-124.
  28. Chapela, F., Lara, Y., 1995. El papel de las comunidades campesinas en la conservación de los bosques. México, Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible/Era.
  29. Donovan, J., Stoian, D., Poole, N., 2008. Global review of rural community enterprises: The long and winding road to creating viable businesses and potential shortcuts. Technical Series. No. 29. CATIE. Turrialba, Costa Rica.
  30. Garibay, C., 2007. El dilema corporativo del comunalismo forestal. Descatos, 23, 251-274.
  31. Goldman, C., Goshs, I., Piaskoski, M., 2003. The role of efficiencies in telecomunications merger review. Federal Communications Law Journal.
  32. Grant, R., 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166664
  33. Grossmam, S., Hart, O., 1986. The cost and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration, Journal of Political Economy 94, 691-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261404
  34. Hall, R., 1992. The strategy analysis of intagible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (2), 135-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130205
  35. Hall, R., 1993. A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (8), 607-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140804
  36. Hall, M., Weiss, L., 1967. Firm size and profitability. Review of Economics and Statistics, 49 (8), 319-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1926642
  37. Hart, O., Moore,J., 1990. Property rights and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1119-1158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/261729
  38. Hawawini, G., Subramanian, V., y Verdin, P., 2003. Is performance driven by industry-or firm-specific factors? A new look at the evidence. Strategic management Journal, 24, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.278
  39. Hansen, G., Wernerfelt, B., 1989. Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10 (5), 399-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100502
  40. Hardin, G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 62, 1243-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
  41. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2006. Tendencias y perspectivas del sector forestal en América Latina y el Caribe. 1-178.
  42. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2010. Global forest resource assessment. Forestry Paper, 163. 340.
  43. Hatch, N., Dyer, J., 2004. Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1155-1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.421
  44. Krishna, A., 2000. Creating and harnessing social capital. In: Dasgupta, P., Serageldin, I. (Eds.), Social Capital: A multifaceted perspective. World Bank, Washington, D.C., 71–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08969205000260030801
  45. Ley, Agraria, 2002. Anaya Editores, Mexico City.
  46. Mahoney, J., 1992. The choice of organizational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration. Strategic Management Journal 13 (8), 559-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130802
  47. Mahoney, J., Pandian, R., 1992. The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (5), 363-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130505
  48. Mauri, A., Michaels, P., 1998. Firm an industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (3), 211-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199803)19:3%3C211::aid-smj947%3E3.0.co;2-t
  49. Merino, P. L., Segura-Warnholtz, G., 2005. Forest and conservation policies and their impacts on forest communities in Mexico. In Bray, D. B., Merino, P. L., Barry, D., (Eds), The community forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes, Austin, Texas, University of Texas Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9073-6
  50. Miller, D., 2004. Firm´s technological resources and the performance effects of diversification: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1097-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.411
  51. Muñoz-Piña, C., de Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E., 2003. Recrafting rights over common property resources in Mexico: Divide, incorporate, and equalize. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52 (1), 129–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/380104
  52. McDaniel, J.M., 2003. Community-based forestry and timber certification in southeast Bolivia. Small-scale Forest. Economics, Management and Policy 2 (3), 327– 341.
  53. McEvily, S., Chakravarthy, B., 2002. The perspective of knowledge-based advantage: An empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 285-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.223
  54. McGahan, A., Porter, M., 1997. How much industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, 18, 15-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+%3C15::aid-smj916%3E3.3.co;2-t
  55. Nolan, T., M., 2001. Community based forest management: Commercial harvesting of the rainforest of Indonesia. The International Forestry Review, 3 (3), 231–235.
  56. North, D. C., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700040493
  57. Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11615-002-0044-2
  58. Ostrom, E., 1995. Self-organization and social capital. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(1), 131-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/4.1.131
  59. Pearce, D. W., Turner, R. K., 1990. Economics of natural resources and the environment. The John Hopkins University Press.
  60. Penrose, E., 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  61. Perry, M., 1989. Vertical Integration. Determinants and effects in: Schmalensee, R., Willing, R. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
  62. Porter, M., 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors. Free Press: New York.
  63. Porter, M., 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0034-75901985000200009
  64. Putz, F. E., Pinard, M. A., Fredericksen, T.S., Peña-Claros, M., 2004. Forest science and the BOLFOR experience: Lessons learned about natural forest management in Bolivia. In: Zarin, D., Alavapati, J. R. R., Putz, F. E., Schmink, M., (Eds.), working forests in the neotropics: Conservation through sustainable management? Columbia University Press, New York, 64–96.
  65. Prescott, J., Kohli, A., Venkataraman, N., 1986. The market share-profitability relationship: an empirical assessment of major assertions and contradictions. Strategic Management Journal, 7 (4), 377-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070407
  66. Rumelt, R., 1991. How much industry matter? Strategic management Journal, 12, 167-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120302
  67. Segura-Warnholtz, G., 2014. Quince años de políticas públicas para la acción colectiva en comunidades forestales. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 76 (5),105-135.
  68. Schlager E., Ostrom, E., 1992. Property rights regimes and natural resources. A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68 (3), 249-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146375
  69. Scherr, S. J., White, A., Kaimowitz, D., 2003. A new agenda for conservation and poverty reduction: Making forest markets work for low-income producers. Washington, DC: Forest Trends/Center for International Forestry Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0030605305240188
  70. Schroeder, R., Bates, K., Juntila, M., 2002. A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 105-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.213
  71. Shen, Y., Zhang, Y., Xu, X., Zhu, Z., Jiang, X., 2009. Towards decentralization and privatization of China’s collective forestlands. International Forestry Review, 11 (4), 28-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1505/ifor.11.4.456
  72. Schmalensee, R., 1985. Do markets differ much. The American Economic Review, 75, 341-350.
  73. Schmalensee, R., Willing, R., 1992. Handbook of industrial organization. 1, North-Holland. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090130209
  74. Stoian, D., Donovan, J., 2010. Poverty-environment dividends of rural community enterprises: insights from a cross-sectorial study in Latin America and the Caribbean. Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE). Program competitiveness and value chains Center for Competitiveness of Ecoenterprises (CeCoEco).
  75. Tirole, J., 1989. The theory of industrial organization, Cambridge, MIT Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090110207
  76. Toledo, H. E., 2012. Instituciones e integración vertical de las empresas forestales comunitarias de productos maderables de Oaxaca: Caso ICOFOSA. Tesis de maestría. IPN. Mexico.
  77. Villavicencio, G., Hansen, R., Bliss, J., 2012. Factors impacting marketplace success of community forest enterprises: The case of TIP muebles, Oaxaca, Mexico. Small-scale Forestry. Published online: doi 10.1007/s11842-011-9188-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11842-011-9188-5
  78. Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  79. Williamson, O. E., 1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press, New York.
  80. Williamson, O. E., 1981. The economics of organizations: the transaction cost approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87 (3), 548-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/227496
  81. Williamson, O. E., 1985. The economics institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/135384
  82. Wilshusen, P. R., 2003. Negotiating devolution: Community conflict, structural power, and local forest management in Quintana Roo, Mexico. University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources and Environment, Ann Arbor.
  83. White, A., Martin, A., 2002. Who owns the world’s forests? Washington, DC: Forest Trends. Center for International Law.
  84. Xie, Y., Wen, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, X., 2013. Impact of property rights reform on household forest management investment: An empirical study of southern China. Forest Policy and Economics 34, 73-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.12.002
  85. Yli-Renko, H., Autio., E., Sapienza, J., 2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology–based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 587-613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.183
  86. Zhang, Y., Uusivuori, J., Kuuluvainen, J., 2000. Impacts of economic reforms on rural forestry in China. Forest Policy and Economics 1 (1), 27-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1389-9341(00)00007-1
  87. Zhang, Y., 2002. The Impacts of economic reforms on the efficiency of silviculture: A non-parametric approach. Environment and Development Economics 7 (1), 107-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x02000062

Cite this Article:

International Journal of Sciences is Open Access Journal.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
Author(s) retain the copyrights of this article, though, publication rights are with Alkhaer Publications.

Issue November 2017

Volume 6, November 2017


Table of Contents


Order Print Copy

World-wide Delivery is FREE

Share this Issue with Friends:


Submit your Paper