Prey Selection By Tiger (Panthera Tigris Tigris) In Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve Nepal

Prey Selection By Tiger (Panthera Tigris Tigris) In Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve Nepal

Loading document ...
Page
of
Loading page ...

Author(s)

Author(s): Raj Kumar Baniya, Chitra Bahadur Baniya, Pu Mou, Jianping Ge

Download Full PDF Read Complete Article

DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1221 236 648 90-99 Volume 6 - Mar 2017

Abstract

Predator-prey relationship indicates the status of wildlife conservation. Identifying preys and their contribution to the diets of tigers are important for making conservation meaningful. The main objective of this research was to investigate the distribution pattern of tigers and availability of their preys in the Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve (SWR), Far west Nepal. This research mainly focused on distribution and identification of scats, determination of prey species and factors affecting their selection. This study was conducted in SWR of 305 km2 area in Kanchanpur district, lowland, Far west Nepal. It was gazatted as Royal Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve in 1973. Data were collected through direct field observations and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) method. Relationship between tigers and preys was determined through scats analysis. Data were analyzed with the help of Scatman and vegan through R Software. Prey and habitat selection analysis showed that chital (Axis axis) preferred sal (Shorea robusta) forests while barking (Muntiacus muntjak) and swamp (Rucervus duvauceli) deer were abundant in river sides and fireline/mixed forests respectively. Then, identified eight prey species from 65 scats of which six percent had double preys and 94% single preys. Chital constituted 30% and swamp deer 17% of the total tiger’s diet. The population density of chital was the highest (54.10 animals/km2) followed by common langur (25.27 animals/km2), swamp deer (21.50 animals/km2) and hog deer (16.30 animals/km2). Chital, hog deer and langur were preyed significantly (P ≤ 0) higher by tigers indicating positive selection of these species. Swamp deer was preyed significantly low (P > 0) indicating negative selection probably due to its large size. Tigers prefer medium to slightly large prey species like chital of about 55 kg body weight compared to large sized swamp deer and sambar weighing more than 150 and 210 kg respectively in SWR. Since, both tigers and preys are endangered due to poaching and habitat loss, regular monitoring of them is essential to develop the tiger conservation plan.

Keywords

food habitat, Panthera tigris tigris, prey selection, scat analysis

References

  1. Ackerman, B.B., Lindzey, F.G., Hemker, T.P., 1984. Cougar food habits in southern Utah. Journal of Wildlife Management. 48: 147–155.
  2. Adhikari, S., Khadka, A., 2009. Study on relative abundance and distribution of tiger base (ungulates) in Khata Coridor, Bardia National Park, Kathmandu University. Journal of Science and Engineering Technology. 5: 112–135.
  3. Anonymous, 2008. Annual Report 2007-2008, Government of Nepal, ministry of forest and soil conservation, Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation.
  4. Bagchi, S., Goyal, S.P., Sankar, K., 2003. Prey abundance and prey selection by tiger (Pantheratigris) in semi-arid, deciduous forest in western India. Zoological Society London. 20: 285–290.
  5. Biswas, S., Sankar, K., 2002. Prey abundance and food habit of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Zoology London. 256: 411–420.
  6. Bonnin, L., 2008. Prey selection by tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) in the Karnali floodplain of B ardia National Park, Nepal. Journal of Zoology London. 23–39.
  7. Braack, E.O., 2005. African trans frontier conservation area, real benefits to agriculture and rural development.
  8. De Marinis, A.M., Asprea, A., 2006. Hair identification key of wild and domestic ungulates from southern Europe. Wildlife Biology. 12: 305–320.
  9. Dinerstein, E.C., Loucks, A., Heydlauff, E., Wikramanayake, G., Bryja, J., Forrest, J., Ginsberg, S., Klenzendorf, P., Leimgruber, T., O’Brien, T., 2006. Setting Priorities for the Conservation and Recovery of Wild Tiger; 2005-2015; A User’s Guide WWF, WCS, Smithsonian and NFWF-STF, Washington, D.C. – New York.
  10. Dinerstein, E., 1980. ecological survey of Royal Bardia Karnali Wildlife Reserve. Part III: Ungulate Populations. Biological Conservation. 18: 5–37.
  11. DNPWC, 2007. Anual report, Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation/GoN, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  12. DNPWC, 2009. Anual report, Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation/GoN, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  13. Grey, J., 2009. Prey Selection by Tigers (Pantheara tigris tigris) in the Karnali Flood Plain of Bardia National Park, Nepal. (M.Sc.Thesis). Imperial College, London.
  14. Hariahar, A., Kurien, A.J., Pandar, B., Goyal, S.P., 2007. Response of tiger population to habitat with ungulate prey and human disturbance in Rijaji National Park, Uttarakhanda, India. (Final technical report, 2007). Wildlife Institute of India, Dhradun.
  15. Hayward, M.W., Je˛drzejewski, W., Je˛drzewska, B., 2012. Prey preferences of the tiger Panthera tigris. Journal of Zoology, London. 286: 221–231.
  16. Hines,J.E.,Link,W.A.,1994.ScatmanSoftware.Retrievedon02/01/2011.htt://search.nasa.gov/search/search.jsp?nasaInclude=Scatman.
  17. Jnawali, S.R., Wegge, P., 1993. Space and habitat use by a small re-introduced population of greater one-horned rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicorns) in Bardia National Park in Nepal- a preliminary report. Presented at the International Rhino Conference, San Diego.
  18. Johnsingh, A.J.T., 1983. Large mammalian prey-predators in Bandipur. Journal of Bombay Natural Historical Society. 80: 1–57.
  19. Karanth, K.U., 2003. Tiger ecology and conservation in the Indian subcontinent. Journal of Bombay Natural Historical Society. 100: 169–189.
  20. Karanth, K.U., Madhusudan, M.D., 2002. Mitigation Human- Wildlife Conflicts in Southern Asia. In; Making Parks Work, Strategies for Preserving Tropical Nature. 250–264.
  21. Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D., 1998. Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology 79: 2852–2862.
  22. Karanth, K.U., Stith, B.M., 1999. Prey depletion as a critical determinant of tiger population viability. In Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes: 100-113. Siedensticker, J., Christie, S. and Jackson, P. (Eds). Cambridge University Press.
  23. Karanth, K.U., Sunquist, M.E., 1995. Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dholes and hole in tropical forests. Journal of Animal Ecology. 64: 439–450.
  24. Karki, J.B., 2011. Occupancy and abundance of Tigers and their prey in the Terai Arc Landscape, Nepal. (P.hd. Thesis). Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, Uttarakhand.
  25. Karki, J.B., Jnawali, S.R., Shrestha, R., Pandey, M.B., Gurung, G., Thapa (Karki), M., 2009. Tiger and their prey base in Terai Arc Landscape Nepal. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation and Department of Forest.
  26. Lamichhane, S., 2011. prey selection by Panthera tigris of Chitwan National Park. M.Sc. thesis: Submitted to the Kathmandu University.
  27. Link, W.A., Karanth, K.U., 1994. Correcting for overdispersion in tests of prey selectivity. Ecology 75: 2456–2459.
  28. Miquelle, D., Smirnov, E.N., Merrill, T.W., Myslenkov, A.E., Quigley, H.B., Hornocker, M.G., Schleyer, B., Seidensticker, J., Christie, S., Jackson, P., 1999. Hierarchical spatial analysis of Amur tiger relationships to habitat and prey. In Riding the tiger: tiger conservation inhuman-dominated landscapes: 71–99. Seidensticker J., Christie S. & and Jackson P. (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Zoological Society London.
  29. Miquelle, D., Smirnov, E.N., Quigley, H.B., Hornocker, M.G., Nikolayev, I.G., Matyushkin, E.N., 1996. Foodhabits of Amur tigers in Sikhote-Alin Zapovednik and theRussianthe Russian Far East, and implications for conservation. Journal of Wildlife Research. 1: 138–147.
  30. Mukherjee, S., Goyal, S.P., Chellam, R., 1994a. Refined techniques for the analysis of Asiatic lion panthera leo persica scats. Acta Theriologica. 39: 425–430.
  31. Oli, M.K., Taylor, I.R., Rogers, E., 1994. Snow leopard Panthera uncia prredation of livestock : an assessment of local perceptions in the Annapurna Conservation area, Nepal. Biological Conservation. 68: 63–68.
  32. Sankar, K., Qureshi, Q., Nigam, P., Malik, P.K., Sinha, P.R., Mehrotra, R.N., Gopal, R., Bhattacharjee, S., Mandal, K., Gupta, S., 2010. Monitoring of reintroduced tigers in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Western India: preliminary findings on home range, prey selection and food habits. Tropical Conservation Science. 3 (3): 301–318.
  33. Schaller, G.B., 1967. The deer and the Tiger. University Chicago press, Chicago.
  34. Seidensticker, J., Christie, S., Jackson, P., 1999. Overview in Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes: 1-3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  35. Shrestha, M., 2004. Relative Ungulate abundance in a fragmented landscape; Implication for Tiger Conservation. A thesis submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota for the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
  36. Sinclair, A.R.., Byrom, A., 2006. Understanding ecosystem dynamics for conservation of biota. Journal of Animal Ecology. 75: 64–79.
  37. Šmilauer, P., 2002. CanoDraw for Windows 4.0.
  38. Smith, J.L.D., Ahearn, S.C., McDougal, C., 1998. Landscape analysis of Tiger distribution and habitat quality in Nepal. Conservation Biology. 12: 1338–1346.
  39. Sunquist, M.E., 1981. The social organization of tigers (Panthera tigris) in Royal Chitawan National Park, Nepal. Smithson Contribution to Zoology. 336: 1–98.
  40. Sunquist, M.E., 2010. Tigers: ecology and behavior. In Tigers of the world: 19–33. Tilson, R.L. and Nyhus, P.J. (Eds). San Diego: Elsevier.
  41. Sunquist, M.E., Karanth, K.U., Sunquist, F.C., 1999a. Ecology, behaviour and resilience of the tiger and its conservation needs. In Tigers of the world: the science, politics and conservation of Panthera tigris: 5. Tilson, R.L. and Nyhus, P.J. (Eds). New York: Academic Press.
  42. Sunquist, M.E., Karanth, K.U., Sunquist, F.C., 1999b. Ecology, behavior and resilience of the tiger and its conservation needs. In: J. Seidensticker, Sarah Christie and Peter Jackson (eds). Riding the tiger: tiger conservation in human dominated landscapes.
  43. Sunquist, M.E., Sunquist, F.C., 1989. Ecological constraints on predation by large felids. In: Gittleman, J. L., (ed). Carnivore behaviour, ecology and evolution. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
  44. TAL, 2004. The Terai Arc Landscape Bengal Tiger in the Himalayas, shadow.
  45. Teerink, B.J., 1991. Hair of West-European Mammals. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  46. Ter Braak, C.G., 2002. CANOCO- a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by (partial) (detrended) (canonical) correspondance analysis, principal component analysis and redundancy analysis. Version 4.5. Wageningen.
  47. Thapa, T.B., 2011. Habitat suitability evaluation for Leopard (Panthera pardus) using Remote Sensing and GIS in and around Chitwan National Park, Nepal. (P.hd.). Wildlife Institute of India, Chandrabani, Dehradun.
  48. Weaver, D.J., 1990. A survey of Bengal Floricans (Houbaropsis bengalensis) at Royal Suklaphanta Wildlife Reserve and Royal Bardia National Park, western Nepal.
  49. Wegge, P., Odden, M., Pokhrel, C.P., Storass, T., 2009. Predator prey relationship and responces of ungulates and their predators to the establishment of protected area. A case study of Tigers, Leopords and their prey in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Biological Conservation. 142: 189–202.
  50. Wilson, D.E., Mittermeier, R.A., 2009. Handbook of the mammals of the world. Vol. 1. Carnivores. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.
  51. Yadav, H.K., 2006. Density, Biomass and Distribution of Tiger’s Prey Species in Shukla Phanta Wildlife Reserve, Western Lowland, Nepal. Thesis submitted to Kathmandu University.

Cite this Article:

  • BibTex
  • RIS
  • APA
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Vancouver
  • Chicago

International Journal of Sciences is Open Access Journal.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
Author(s) retain the copyrights of this article, though, publication rights are with Alkhaer Publications.

Search Articles

Issue October 2019

Volume 8, October 2019


Table of Contents


Order Print Copy

World-wide Delivery is FREE

Share this Issue with Friends:


Submit your Paper