Farmer’s Perceptions on Importance and Role of Agroforestry Species in Karago, Rwanda

Farmer’s Perceptions on Importance and Role of Agroforestry Species in Karago, Rwanda

Loading document ...
Loading page ...


Author(s): Marie Claire UWINEZA, Sun YUJUN, Augustin NDEKEZI

Download Full PDF Read Complete Article

DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1882 73 264 72-79 Volume 8 - Jan 2019


Rwandan environment has been negatively impacted by agricultural activities. In many forest areas, trees have been cut down by surrounding people looking for cultivatable and grazing land. This study examined farmer’s perceptions on importance and role of agroforestry species in land use system. A sample of 67 farmers were interviewed on agroforestry species available in their farms and their role ;preferences in regard to different agroforestry species; the reason and problems of growing different agroforestry trees; different products obtained in agroforestry systems and their contribution to household income. Therefore, the results of the study show that 100 % of the interviewers have the agroforestry species in their farms. The most agroforestry species planted are Erythrina abyssinica (100 %) followed by Alnus acuminata (64.2 %). Farmer’s perception on agroforestry species in their farmland is that those species contribute in the considerable manner for the stability of the family income. This is proved by the NTFPs which generate incomes such as: fire wood, stakes fodder, fruits and building poles. Farmers also consider the role of agroforestry species in soil conservation in different manner such as soil erosion control, soil holding and increasing soil productivity. The major constraints to agroforestry practice include lack of access to agroforestry species seedlings; lack of capital, lack of labour supply and lack of knowledge about tree management. Considering these results indicate a strong role and importance of agroforestry species, hence the need to promote agroforestry technologies and practices in Karago sector.


Agroforestry Species, Farmer’s Perceptions, Species Preference, Role and Importance


  1. Ajayi,O.C.,Massi,C.Katanga, R.,and Kabwe,G.(2006). Typology and characteristics of farmers planting improved fallows in southern Africa. Zambian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(2), 1-5.
  2. Amanon, K.S., (1996) The perspective of farmers. Forest Department .Ghana. 202p
  3. Assogbadjo,A.E.,Kakai,R.G.,Vodouhe,F.G.,Djagoum,C.A.M.S.,Codjia,J.T.C.,and Sinsin,B.(2012). Biodiversity and socioeconomic factors supporting farmers’ choice of wild edible trees in the agroforestry systems of Benin. Forest Policy and Economic, 14, 41-49.
  4. Busienei, R.J (1991). The potential of women’s participation in agroforestry in Uasin Gishu District. Phil, M. thesis. Moi Universtry.
  5. Garrit, D. (2004). World agroforestry and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. Agroforestry Systems, 61. 5-17
  6. Gladwin, C. H., Peterson, J. S., Phiri, D., and Uttaro, R. (2002). Agroforestry adoption decisions, structural adjustment and gender in Africa. Internatonal in association with the International Center for Research in Agroforestry.
  7. Glover, E.K., Hassan, B.A., Glover, M.K., (2013) Analysis of socio-economic influencing adoption of agroforestry practices. International Journal of Agriculture and Agroforestry, 3,178.
  8. Kwesiga, F., Akinnifesi, F. K., Mafongoya, P. L., McDermott, M. H., and Agumya, A. (2003). Agroforestry research and development in southern Africa during the 1990s: Review and challenges ahead. Agroforestry Systems, 59(3), 173-186.
  9. Lehmann,j. Peter,I. ,Steglish,c.,Gebauer,G.,Huwe,B., and Zech,W. (1998). Below-ground interactions in dryland agroforestry. Forest Ecology and Management, 111, 157-169.
  10. Lundgren, B. O., and J. B. Raintree. (1982). Agricultural Research for Development: Potential and Challenges in Asia. Sustained Agroforestry, 37 - 49.
  11. Masozera, M.K., and Alavalapati, J.R.R. (2004). Agroforestry dependency and its implications for protected areas management: Acase study from Nyungwe Forest of Reserve, Rwanda. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 85-92.
  12. Nair, P. K. R. (1993). An Introduction to Agroforestry. Kluwer, Boston.
  13. Neufeldt,H.,Dawson,I.K., Leedeling, E.Ajayi, O.C., and al. (2012).Climate Change Vulnerability of Agroforestry. Word Agroforestry Center, 143.
  14. Neupane, R.P., and Thapa, G.B. (2001). Impact of agroforestry intervention on soil fertility and farm income under the subsistence farming of middle hills, Nepal. Agruculture Ecosystem Environment, 84, 157-167.
  15. Nguyen, Q., Hoang, M.H., Obom, I., and Noordwijk, M.V. (2013). Multipurpose agroforestry as a climate change resiliency option for farmers: an example of local adaptation in Vietnam Climatic Change, 117, 241-257
  16. Phiri, E., Verplancke, H., Kwesiga, F.and Mafongoya, P. (2003) Water balance and maize yield following Sesbania sesban fallow in eastern Zambia. Agroforestry systems, 59(3), 197-205.
  17. Van Damma,P. and Kindt, R. (2012). Ethnobotanical methods .In agroforestry tree domestication: A primer. Kenya: World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF).

Cite this Article:

International Journal of Sciences is Open Access Journal.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.
Author(s) retain the copyrights of this article, though, publication rights are with Alkhaer Publications.

Search Articles

Issue June 2024

Volume 13, June 2024

Table of Contents

World-wide Delivery is FREE

Share this Issue with Friends:

Submit your Paper