Assessing the Effectiveness of Padlet Instructional Tool in the Teaching and Learning of some Ecological Concepts

Author(s): M. Baidoo, Y. Ameyaw, J. N. Annan

The study investigated padlet instructional (PLI) tool as an activator of students’ performance in some ecological concepts in some selected Senior High Schools in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. The Quasi-experimental design was adopted for the study. A sample size of 102 was purposively sampled from the accessible population. Biology Concept Achievement Test (BCAT) was used for data collection. Data obtained from the study were subjected to both descriptive and inferential analysis. The mean, standard deviation, box plot, mean plot, eta squared effect size, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA and Post-Hoc Tukey HSD were calculated using SPSS version 21. It was established that students in PLI-1 who were taught in the school ICT laboratory and PLI-2 who were taught at home during COVID-19 vacation using the padlet tool instructional approach statistically outperformed their counterparts taught with conventional lecture-based instructional approach in terms of their academic performance (mean scores) ( p ˂ .05). However, the paired comparison PLI-1 and PLI-2 showed no statistically significant difference between the two instructional groups in terms of their academic performance (Md = 1.84, p-value = .442 > .05) (mean scores). One of the reasons for this result, might be because the use of the tool was a novel, and far more productive than the use of the conventional lecture-based instructional approach in the teaching and learning of ecological concepts. It could be deduced that the tool allowed the teachers to engage the students in an interactive virtual session, where they instantly submitted, and shared completed class task and group assignments. The study again, revealed that the interaction effect of the instructional approach and gender was not statistically significant as evidenced in the p-value > .05 [F(2, 94) = .113, p = .893).

Padlet Instructional Tool, Academic Performance, Ecological Concept

1. Akpochafo, W. P. (2009). Social Studies and Feminist Issues for Teacher Education. Benin City: Justice Jeco Press and Publishing Ltd
2. Algraini, F. N. (2014). The Effect of Using Padlet on Enhancing EFL Writing Performance. University name: Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from (Arab World English Journalhttp://awej.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=878:farah-nasser-algraini &catid=20&Itemid=117
3. Arigbabu, A. A., & Mji, A. (2004). Is gender a factor in Mathematics Performance among Nigerian Preservice Teachers? Sex role, 51, 749-753.
4. Bilesanmi, J. B. (2002). Concept-mapping, Students’ Locus of control, and Gender as Determinants of Nigerian High School Students Achievement in Biology, Ife Psychological, 10(2), 98-110.
5. Croxford, L. (2002). Participation in Science, Engineering and Technology at School and in Higher Education. Report to Scottish Executive. Edinburgh: CES, University of Edinburgh.
6. Dembo, S. E., & Bellow, A. S. (2013). Untangling the web: 20 tools to power up your teaching. SAGE, London.
7. Ellis, D. (2015). Using Padlet to Increase Engagement in Lectures. Paper presented at the 195-XIII. Retrieved from httpsearch. proquest. comdocview1728004496accountid=1464
8. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111(23), 8410–8415.
9. Fuchs, B. (2014). The writing is on the wall: using Padlet for whole-class engagement. LOEX Quarterly 40(4), 7- 9. Retrieved from http://uknowledge.uky.edu/libraries_facpub/240 Gallup, Inc. (2013). U.S. overall: Gallup Student Poll Results. 1-6.
10. Leedy, P. D. & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. http://www.worldcat.org/title/practical-research- planning-and-design/oclc/53831701
11. Haris, M., Yunus, M. & Bandusah, J. (2017). The effectiveness of using padlet in esl classroom. International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR), 5(2), 783-788
12. Manguwal, C. (2006). Gender difference in cognition: A function of Maturation role. Journal of School Psychology, 7(4), 22-28.
13. Moratelli, K., & DeJarnette, N. K. (2014) Clickers to the rescue. The Reading Teacher, 67(8), 86–593. doi: 10.1002/trtr.1261
14. Nworgu, B. G. (2006). Educational Research. Basic Issues and Methodology. (2nd ed).84- 91. University Trust Publishers.
15. Ogunkola, J. B., & Bilesanmi, A. (2000). Effects of laboratory and lecture methods on students’ achievement in Biology. African Journal of Education, 5(2), 247–260.
16. Pandian, S. S. (2004). Cooperative learning in Biology: the effects of computers, Yupia, India: Department of Education, Arunachi University India.
17. Rashid, A. A., Yunus, M. M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using Padlet for Collaborative Writing among ESL Learners. Creative Education, 10, 610-620. Received: January 8, 2019 https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.103044.
18. Usman, I. A. (2000). The relationship between students' performance in practical activities and their academic achievement in integrated science using NISTEP mode of teaching. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
19. Weller, A. (2013) The use of Web 2.0 technology for pre-service teacher learning in science education. Research in Teacher Education, 3(2), 40–46.
20. Zhang, M., Trussell, R., Gallegos, B., & Asam, R. (2015) Using math apps for improving student learning: An exploratory study in an inclusive fourth grade classroom. Techtrends, 59(2), pp. 32–39. doi: 10.1007/s11528-015-0837-y.